News

At what place is a debt under a letter of credit situated?

09/11/2015

Debt under a letter of credit is situated in the place where payment is to be made.

In the recent judgment of Taurus Petroleum Ltd v State Oil Company of the Ministry of Oil, Republic of Iraq [1], the English Court of Appeal considered where a debt under a letter of credit is situated. A letter of credit is a guarantee from a bank to a seller that the amount owed for the goods will be paid. Letters of credit are often used to finance import-export transactions.  

Facts

A Shell group company had agreed to purchase crude oil from State Oil Company of the Ministry of Oil, Republic of Iraq ("SOMO"). Crédit Agricole was to pay the amount owed to SOMO under a letter of credit (the "CA Letter"). Separately, SOMO had not paid money it owed to Taurus Petroleum Limited ("Taurus") under an arbitration award. Taurus brought proceedings seeking a third party debt order, called a garnishee order in Ireland, for the funds payable under the CA Letter.

Crédit Agricole had issued the CA Letter in London. However, the CA Letter contained no governing law clause. The CA Letter provided that Crédit Agricole would pay SOMO in a designated account in New York. Taurus sought a third party debt order for Crédit Agricole's debt to SOMO. You would seek a third party debt order where you are owed money by a debtor and a third party owes money to that debtor. The order attaches to the third party debt requiring it to be paid to you instead of to the company or person owed the debt. Courts only have jurisdiction to issue the order if it would be recognised by the courts where the debt is situated.

Judgment

Usually, a debt is situated where a debtor lives, as the generally recognised rules of territorial jurisdiction mean this is the one place where you can seek to recover it without question.  As Crédit Agricole's London branch owed the amount due under the CA Letter, Taurus argued the debt was situated in England. The English Court of Appeal disagreed. It held that a debt under a letter of credit is different from ordinary debts and is situated where you make payment. In this case, the debt was situated in New York as it was payable to an account in New York. There was no evidence that a third party debt order made by an English court would be recognised under New York law. The court could not make the order as it could not be shown that Crédit Agricole's liability would be discharged under New York law.

Conclusion

Banks issuing letters of credit should always include a governing law clause. Most banks and financial institutions will have a governing law clause in their standard terms and conditions. In the absence of a governing law clause, the debt under a letter of credit could be deemed to be situated in the jurisdiction where the payment must be made to a seller.

[1] Taurus Petroleum Ltd v State Oil Company of the Ministry of Oil, Republic of Iraq [2015] EWCA Civ 835

Source: www.lexology.com 4 November 2015


Back to recent news

Recent News

26/11/2024

The latest newsletter is now available in the members trade information section under the category of 'Newsletters'...more

ICC release Technical Advisory Briefing No. 11 - Definition of Trade Finance 19/09/2024

Recognising that there is no global standard for the defining Trade Finance, this Briefing document provides a suggested text and has been recommended for use by the ICC Banking Commisison Steering Committee...more

Latest Question

We, as the issuing bank, requested the below document, under field 46A. “Insurance policy/certificate for 10.00 percent above CIF value payable to the order of Sampath bank PLC, covering institute cargo clauses (a), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage.” Insurance certificate is presented containing below wording on the face side of the document. “The settlement of loss and damage will be effected, unless otherwise provided, through the intermediary of Marsh SA/NV to whom all documents are to be forwarded for this purpose, and will collect the indemnity under deduction of a commission of one percent” Also, it indicates the LC conditions as a mirror image as follows under the heading of "letter of credit conditions" whereas insurance conditions are incorporated separately in the certificate: "covering institute cargo clauses (A), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage" Having considered the above clauses, we have quoted below discrepancies. 1) Insurance policy indicates a deductible of 1 pct instead of irrespective of percentage. 2) Insurance not marked premium paid Beneficiary’s bank disagrees with our discrepancy and raised below argument: “Insurance policy/certificate does not indicate a deductible of 1 pct irrespective of percentage on the face of the document and banks will not examine terms and condition in insurance document as per ISBP paragraph K22 and marked as premium paid under the LC conditions. Considering above, may we have your opinion on the discrepancy quoted by us and the counter argument raised by the beneficiary’s bank.