News

Federal Board of Revenue, Pakistan, to launch online verification of LCs to curb under-invoicing

22/11/2015

The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) is all set to launch a mechanism for the online verification of letters of credit (LCs) with the banks to curb money-laundering and under-invoicing, official sources said on Friday.

A senior official of Pakistan Customs said imports worth billions of dollars are made against payment sent aboard through Hawala and Hundi.

Therefore, "a mechanism is being developed with the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) to verify the LCs opened against the import proceeds," said the official. FBR and SBP recently launched the online submission of Form-E, which can be verified with the bank that issued the letter for exports.

In the past, fake forms deprived the country of foreign exchange as exports were sent abroad without inflows.

"Through online LCs verification, the customs authorities would be able to identify the origin of the country, the value of imported item and total amount remitted to the foreign seller," the official said. "It will help in curtailing the menace of under-invoicing and smuggling through official channels."

A FBR report said importers under-invoiced $2.43 billion worth of imported goods alone in 2013 by misusing the facility under the free trade agreement between Pakistan and China. Another amount of $829 million has been over invoiced in the same year at the declaration stage.

The latest figures of under-invoicing reached to around six billion dollars, said a tax official.

The FBR sources said the online verification of LCs would also serve the purpose of broadening the tax base and documentation of economy.

They said a large number of importers have obtained the national tax numbers (NTN) but they are non-filers.

The directorate of broadening of tax base recently asked the customs authorities to provide the directorate with the details of all active importers.

(Source: The News International, 21 November)


Back to recent news

Recent News

26/11/2024

The latest newsletter is now available in the members trade information section under the category of 'Newsletters'...more

ICC release Technical Advisory Briefing No. 11 - Definition of Trade Finance 19/09/2024

Recognising that there is no global standard for the defining Trade Finance, this Briefing document provides a suggested text and has been recommended for use by the ICC Banking Commisison Steering Committee...more

Latest Question

We, as the issuing bank, requested the below document, under field 46A. “Insurance policy/certificate for 10.00 percent above CIF value payable to the order of Sampath bank PLC, covering institute cargo clauses (a), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage.” Insurance certificate is presented containing below wording on the face side of the document. “The settlement of loss and damage will be effected, unless otherwise provided, through the intermediary of Marsh SA/NV to whom all documents are to be forwarded for this purpose, and will collect the indemnity under deduction of a commission of one percent” Also, it indicates the LC conditions as a mirror image as follows under the heading of "letter of credit conditions" whereas insurance conditions are incorporated separately in the certificate: "covering institute cargo clauses (A), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage" Having considered the above clauses, we have quoted below discrepancies. 1) Insurance policy indicates a deductible of 1 pct instead of irrespective of percentage. 2) Insurance not marked premium paid Beneficiary’s bank disagrees with our discrepancy and raised below argument: “Insurance policy/certificate does not indicate a deductible of 1 pct irrespective of percentage on the face of the document and banks will not examine terms and condition in insurance document as per ISBP paragraph K22 and marked as premium paid under the LC conditions. Considering above, may we have your opinion on the discrepancy quoted by us and the counter argument raised by the beneficiary’s bank.