News

ICC Banking Commission submission on BCBS revisions to the standardised approach to credit risk

29/07/2015

Earlier this year, the ICC Banking Commission, through its Trade Register Working Group, was invited to respond to proposals published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) entitled 'Revisions to the standardised approach (RSA) for credit risk and capital floors: The design of a framework based on standardised approaches.' In a letter sent to the BCBS on 23 March 2015 the ICC, speaking on behalf of the trade finance industry, expressed its support for the recalibration of the existing framework. The Banking Commission's submission, which has recently been released by the ICC, addresses numerous substantive issues. Specific recommendations include requests for the BCBS to consider:

Differentiated treatment for claims on banks less than 90 days old and rolled over.

CCF for commitments be revised to 20% or 50% based on exposure/product, in lieu of 75%.

The application of 0% CCF for certain types of trade finance commitments.

Recalibration of CCF from 50% to 20% for certain types of trade-related guarantee exposures.

A redrafting of clause 53 aimed at ensuring consistency in the application of CCF to Letters of Credit. 

A copy of the submission can be viewed here ICC Letter to BCBS Revisions to the Standardised Approach to credit risk.pdf


Back to recent news

Recent News

26/11/2024

The latest newsletter is now available in the members trade information section under the category of 'Newsletters'...more

ICC release Technical Advisory Briefing No. 11 - Definition of Trade Finance 19/09/2024

Recognising that there is no global standard for the defining Trade Finance, this Briefing document provides a suggested text and has been recommended for use by the ICC Banking Commisison Steering Committee...more

Latest Question

We, as the issuing bank, requested the below document, under field 46A. “Insurance policy/certificate for 10.00 percent above CIF value payable to the order of Sampath bank PLC, covering institute cargo clauses (a), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage.” Insurance certificate is presented containing below wording on the face side of the document. “The settlement of loss and damage will be effected, unless otherwise provided, through the intermediary of Marsh SA/NV to whom all documents are to be forwarded for this purpose, and will collect the indemnity under deduction of a commission of one percent” Also, it indicates the LC conditions as a mirror image as follows under the heading of "letter of credit conditions" whereas insurance conditions are incorporated separately in the certificate: "covering institute cargo clauses (A), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage" Having considered the above clauses, we have quoted below discrepancies. 1) Insurance policy indicates a deductible of 1 pct instead of irrespective of percentage. 2) Insurance not marked premium paid Beneficiary’s bank disagrees with our discrepancy and raised below argument: “Insurance policy/certificate does not indicate a deductible of 1 pct irrespective of percentage on the face of the document and banks will not examine terms and condition in insurance document as per ISBP paragraph K22 and marked as premium paid under the LC conditions. Considering above, may we have your opinion on the discrepancy quoted by us and the counter argument raised by the beneficiary’s bank.