News

ICC Financial Crime Risk & Policy Group issue 2 Policy Statements

11/06/2019

The ICC has recently issued 2 Policy Statements from the Financial Crime Risk & Policy Group.

How Does Global Trade and Receivables Finance Mitigate against Proliferation Financing?

This paper considers the application of a risk-based approach to assist Financial Institutions (FIs) in identifying high-risk customers and transactions in relation to Proliferation Finance (PF) related to Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). 

The paper can be found here Mitigation against Proliferation Financing.pdf

Financial Crime Compliance Checks on the Price of Goods in Trade Transactions – Are Price Checking Controls Plausible?

This paper outlines the various potential methods for checking the price of goods, and their feasibility, demonstrating that there are significant difficulties in implementing effective price checking for Trade Finance transactions:

- Price Checking, beyond a common sense check for manifestly unusual pricing, is extremely challenging for Financial Institutions to carry out when processing trade documentation.

- It is not plausible for a Financial Institution to develop a binary financial crime control for price checking and automated systems have, to date, not proved to be effective.

- Even where publically available pricing information is available (such as for commodities) price checking remains challenging due to the multiple factors which constitute the final price of the underlying commodity in a transaction

The paper can be found here Financial Crime compliance checks on price of goods.pdf


Back to recent news

Recent News

26/11/2024

The latest newsletter is now available in the members trade information section under the category of 'Newsletters'...more

ICC release Technical Advisory Briefing No. 11 - Definition of Trade Finance 19/09/2024

Recognising that there is no global standard for the defining Trade Finance, this Briefing document provides a suggested text and has been recommended for use by the ICC Banking Commisison Steering Committee...more

Latest Question

We, as the issuing bank, requested the below document, under field 46A. “Insurance policy/certificate for 10.00 percent above CIF value payable to the order of Sampath bank PLC, covering institute cargo clauses (a), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage.” Insurance certificate is presented containing below wording on the face side of the document. “The settlement of loss and damage will be effected, unless otherwise provided, through the intermediary of Marsh SA/NV to whom all documents are to be forwarded for this purpose, and will collect the indemnity under deduction of a commission of one percent” Also, it indicates the LC conditions as a mirror image as follows under the heading of "letter of credit conditions" whereas insurance conditions are incorporated separately in the certificate: "covering institute cargo clauses (A), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage" Having considered the above clauses, we have quoted below discrepancies. 1) Insurance policy indicates a deductible of 1 pct instead of irrespective of percentage. 2) Insurance not marked premium paid Beneficiary’s bank disagrees with our discrepancy and raised below argument: “Insurance policy/certificate does not indicate a deductible of 1 pct irrespective of percentage on the face of the document and banks will not examine terms and condition in insurance document as per ISBP paragraph K22 and marked as premium paid under the LC conditions. Considering above, may we have your opinion on the discrepancy quoted by us and the counter argument raised by the beneficiary’s bank.