News

ICC issues a positioning paper for Standards for Sustainable Trade & Sustainable Trade Finance as a roadmap and vision for industry, policymakers and traders worldwide

10/11/2021

While a number of related standards for sustainable goods and services and financial products exist, none are readily adapted to robustly define and demarcate sustainable trade. 

In light of that, the ICC established a programme in September 2021 to begin defining and setting the standards for sustainable trade in a manner that is practical, comprehensive, and provides sufficient transparency into the sustainability of a transaction. 

Bringing together stakeholders from the ICC, numerous trade banks, corporates, infrastructural players, and Boston Consulting Group, the programme sets out to achieve the following: 

·       Define sustainable trade and trade finance; 

·       Establish a framework to measure and assess the sustainability of a given trade transaction/trade finance portfolio to meet the standards for sustainable trade; and 

·       Engage with the broader trade community to iterate and refine these over time. 

The ambition for the first sprint of this programme has been to establish first principles thinking on the above, and prepare a high-level positioning paper for further industry engagement. In the longer-term, we expect these to shape widely adopted ICC definitions and standards that work to increase the sustainability of global trade. 

The positioning paper can be obtained here


Back to recent news

Recent News

26/11/2024

The latest newsletter is now available in the members trade information section under the category of 'Newsletters'...more

ICC release Technical Advisory Briefing No. 11 - Definition of Trade Finance 19/09/2024

Recognising that there is no global standard for the defining Trade Finance, this Briefing document provides a suggested text and has been recommended for use by the ICC Banking Commisison Steering Committee...more

Latest Question

We, as the issuing bank, requested the below document, under field 46A. “Insurance policy/certificate for 10.00 percent above CIF value payable to the order of Sampath bank PLC, covering institute cargo clauses (a), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage.” Insurance certificate is presented containing below wording on the face side of the document. “The settlement of loss and damage will be effected, unless otherwise provided, through the intermediary of Marsh SA/NV to whom all documents are to be forwarded for this purpose, and will collect the indemnity under deduction of a commission of one percent” Also, it indicates the LC conditions as a mirror image as follows under the heading of "letter of credit conditions" whereas insurance conditions are incorporated separately in the certificate: "covering institute cargo clauses (A), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage" Having considered the above clauses, we have quoted below discrepancies. 1) Insurance policy indicates a deductible of 1 pct instead of irrespective of percentage. 2) Insurance not marked premium paid Beneficiary’s bank disagrees with our discrepancy and raised below argument: “Insurance policy/certificate does not indicate a deductible of 1 pct irrespective of percentage on the face of the document and banks will not examine terms and condition in insurance document as per ISBP paragraph K22 and marked as premium paid under the LC conditions. Considering above, may we have your opinion on the discrepancy quoted by us and the counter argument raised by the beneficiary’s bank.