News

ICC releases its 2015 Global Trade Finance survey

01/10/2015

The ICC has released its 2015 Rethinking Trade & Finance survey report. Amongst the numerous articles, facts and figures etc. readers may find the SWIFT trade messaging trends that appear on pages 52-64 to be of particular interest. Some of the highlights are:

Numbers of MT700 issued in 2014 fell 2.5% when compared to 2013.

Volume of MT103 messages that can be linked to open account payments rose 4.9% when compared to 2013. 

The average value of a letter of credit in 2014 was USD643,000 a USD10,000 reduction on the 2013 figure.

Asia-Pacific region, unsurprisingly, accounts for the vast majority of letters of credit sent and received in 2014. 

Of the MT700's issued in 2014, only 8% contained an instruction to confirm and only 3% contained a ‘may add' authorisation. 

Of the MT700's issued in 2014, 72.3% were available by negotiation, with 12.6% available by payment. 

40% of MT700's issued in 2014 were available with a usance period of between 31 and 60 days, with 31% available with a usance period of between 61 and 90 days. 

The full report can be downloaded from the following link:

ICC Global Survey on Trade Finance


Back to recent news

Recent News

26/11/2024

The latest newsletter is now available in the members trade information section under the category of 'Newsletters'...more

ICC release Technical Advisory Briefing No. 11 - Definition of Trade Finance 19/09/2024

Recognising that there is no global standard for the defining Trade Finance, this Briefing document provides a suggested text and has been recommended for use by the ICC Banking Commisison Steering Committee...more

Latest Question

We, as the issuing bank, requested the below document, under field 46A. “Insurance policy/certificate for 10.00 percent above CIF value payable to the order of Sampath bank PLC, covering institute cargo clauses (a), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage.” Insurance certificate is presented containing below wording on the face side of the document. “The settlement of loss and damage will be effected, unless otherwise provided, through the intermediary of Marsh SA/NV to whom all documents are to be forwarded for this purpose, and will collect the indemnity under deduction of a commission of one percent” Also, it indicates the LC conditions as a mirror image as follows under the heading of "letter of credit conditions" whereas insurance conditions are incorporated separately in the certificate: "covering institute cargo clauses (A), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage" Having considered the above clauses, we have quoted below discrepancies. 1) Insurance policy indicates a deductible of 1 pct instead of irrespective of percentage. 2) Insurance not marked premium paid Beneficiary’s bank disagrees with our discrepancy and raised below argument: “Insurance policy/certificate does not indicate a deductible of 1 pct irrespective of percentage on the face of the document and banks will not examine terms and condition in insurance document as per ISBP paragraph K22 and marked as premium paid under the LC conditions. Considering above, may we have your opinion on the discrepancy quoted by us and the counter argument raised by the beneficiary’s bank.