News

ICC releases its 2015 Global Trade Finance survey

01/10/2015

The ICC has released its 2015 Rethinking Trade & Finance survey report. Amongst the numerous articles, facts and figures etc. readers may find the SWIFT trade messaging trends that appear on pages 52-64 to be of particular interest. Some of the highlights are:

Numbers of MT700 issued in 2014 fell 2.5% when compared to 2013.

Volume of MT103 messages that can be linked to open account payments rose 4.9% when compared to 2013. 

The average value of a letter of credit in 2014 was USD643,000 a USD10,000 reduction on the 2013 figure.

Asia-Pacific region, unsurprisingly, accounts for the vast majority of letters of credit sent and received in 2014. 

Of the MT700's issued in 2014, only 8% contained an instruction to confirm and only 3% contained a ‘may add' authorisation. 

Of the MT700's issued in 2014, 72.3% were available by negotiation, with 12.6% available by payment. 

40% of MT700's issued in 2014 were available with a usance period of between 31 and 60 days, with 31% available with a usance period of between 61 and 90 days. 

The full report can be downloaded from the following link:

ICC Global Survey on Trade Finance


Back to recent news

Recent News

26/11/2024

The latest newsletter is now available in the members trade information section under the category of 'Newsletters'...more

ICC release Technical Advisory Briefing No. 11 - Definition of Trade Finance 19/09/2024

Recognising that there is no global standard for the defining Trade Finance, this Briefing document provides a suggested text and has been recommended for use by the ICC Banking Commisison Steering Committee...more

Latest Question

A credit required: “1 COPY OF APPL'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF THE AMOUNT TO BE PAID (THE REMAINING CLAIMING AMOUNT). THE REMAINING CLAIMING AMOUNT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FINAL PURCHASE PRICE AMOUNT AND EIGHTY PERCENT (80%) INVOICE AMOUNT OF THE PROVISIONAL INVOICE. WITHIN FIVE (05) BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE RECEIPT OF COPY OF FINAL INVOICE FROM THE BENEFICIARY THROUGH ELECTRONIC MAIL, THE APPLICANT SHALL SEND COPY OF APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF DRAWING CERTIFYING THAT THE DRAWING AMOUNT IS IN ORDER. IN THE EVENT THAT APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION IS NOT RECEIVED WITHIN ABOVE MENTIONED TIME, THE BENEFICIARY SHALL PRESENT 20% LC DOCUMENT AGAINST DISCHARGE PORT DOCUMENTS WITHOUT APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATE OF CONFIRMATION OF DRAWING.” Beneficiary presented their confirmation with amount to be paid being the difference between the final purchase price amount and 80% invoice amount of the provisional invoice. Can issuing bank raise a discrepancy of: 1. Certificate of confirmation not issued by the applicant as LC required or 2. Unpresentation 1 copy of applicant’s certificate of confirmation unpresentation. Because issuing bank received applicant’s confirmation that amount to be paid differs with amount to be paid by beneficiary (applicant showed deduction which is not mention under LC) plus applicant provided proof that applicant sent email to beneficiary within 5 banking days as LC required and amount to be paid. Whether or not applicant is protected by any terms or conditions of UCP, ISBP or ICC opinions,… because they presented applicant’s confirmation to beneficiary but beneficiary did not present applicant's document under their presentation?