News

ICC releases the 2020 Global Survey on Trade Finance incorporating an assessment of the impact of COVID-19

21/07/2020

The International Chamber of Commerce’s (ICC) 11th annual Global Survey on Trade Finance reveals that banks are optimistic about the evolving nature of trade finance, though unsurprisingly expect various industry-wide challenges and disruption as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The 2020 ICC Global Survey report – recognised as the world’s most authoritative review of the trade finance industry – has been released based on exclusive information from nearly 350 respondents in more than 80 countries, bolstered by nuanced contributions from an international array of experts from the Asian Development Bank (ADB), AUSTRAC, Boston Consulting Group (BCG), Coriolis Technologies, HSBC, Kountable, SWIFT and TXF.

Survey responses and accompanying commentary continue to reflect evolution and greater receptiveness to innovation in the financing of international trade, whether through traditional techniques or emerging mechanisms in Supply Chain Finance (SCF). The underlying optimism reflected in past surveys is evidenced again this year, as are key topics and areas of global industry focus.

SCF and digital trade are confirmed as key growth priorities for banks, with 86% and 84% of respective respondents calling them an ‘immediate or near-future priority’. However, there is a divide between global and non-global banks on their supply chain finance offerings and investments in digitalisation. Some 64% of global banks surveyed currently offer SCF platforms, compared to just 13% of local banks and 38% of regional banks. Similarly, while 83% of global banks have a digital strategy, only 46% of local banks report having one – highlighting a growing gap between players of different scale and reach.

Other topics are also gaining traction with participants – such as sustainability and financial inclusion, whereby some 67% of respondents indicated that their bank now has a sustainability strategy. What’s more, the majority of banks surveyed are also integrating sustainability risks into their credit risk management procedures.

In terms of ongoing challenges, banks of all sizes remain concerned by the obstacles to their trade finance businesses’ growth posed by regulation and compliance policies, with 56% indicating ‘significant concern’ regarding regulatory requirements.

Assessing the impact of COVID-19

Meanwhile, to quantify the likely impact of the pandemic on the trade finance industry, the report contains results from two additional projects. The first is analysis from BCG to model scenarios on how COVID-19 could disrupt trade, suggesting that trade flow values could fall by anywhere between 11% and 30% in 2020. Findings also indicate that the longer any lockdowns persist, the more severe the global and systemic impact will be, as businesses of all sizes – domestic and international in nature – fight to meet financial and commercial obligations and to remain viable.

ICC also conducted a supplementary COVID-19 survey to understand banks’ sentiment regarding the initial impact of the pandemic on trade finance, with banks across geographies reporting an average 0-10% decrease in their trade flows in the first quarter of 2020, and most expecting at least a 20-30% decline for the full year. In addition, results from the survey reveal that many of the participating banks are supporting their customers during the crisis by extending financing terms, enhancing their digital offerings, and some even relaxing internal policies on original documentation rules.

Despite today’s challenging atmosphere, banks around the world are generally optimistic. Even in the initial, highly disruptive stages of the global COVID-19 crisis, trade finance has remained available and accessible. In turn, the Global Survey confirms and reinforces trade finance’s resilient character and adaptability.

Access to the ICC Global Survey on Trade Finance can be viewed here Please note that you need to complete some details about yourself before receiving a download link from ICC via email.


Back to recent news

Recent News

Spring 2026 Newsletter added to the Members Trade Information section 02/04/2026

The content of this latest newsletter reflects on the discussions at the recent ICC Banking Commission meeting around a possible revision of UCP 600 and the continual updating of ISBP...more

Results of ICC Survey regarding a possible revision of UCP and/or update to ISBP 821 12/02/2026

At the end of 2025, the ICC Banking Commission requested feedback from its members as to whether it was time for a revision of UCP 600 and/or an update to ISBP 821...more

Latest Question

Could you advise us if the invoice was compliant or not for the following Oil LC case: Field 45A:  PRICE IN US DOLLARS PER U.S. BARREL IS THE ARITHMETIC AVERAGE OF THE MEAN QUOTATION FOR SING GASOIL 0.05PCT SULFUR (AAFEX00), AS PUBLISHED BY PLATTS ASIA-PACIFIC/ARAB GULF MARKETSCAN UNDER THE HEADING ASIA PRODUCTS/ FOB SINGAPORE, PLUS US DOLLARS 2.380 PER U.S BARREL EFFECTIVE FOR THE NOMINATION DATE (NOMINATION DATE EQUAL TO DAY ONE). IF THE NOMINATION DATE IS A SATURDAY, SUNDAY OR A WEEKDAY HOLIDAY FOR WHICH THERE IS NO QUOTATION PUBLISHED THEN THE ONE PUBLISHED QUOTATION IMMEDIATELY BEFORE THE NOMINATION DATE SHALL APPLY. ALWAYS ONE PUBLISHED QUOTATION SHALL APPLY. IF THERE IS ANY PUBLISHED CORRECTION TO THE RELEVANT QUOTATION, IT SHALL BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. THE BUYER SHALL HAVE THE OPTION TO TRIGGER PRICING FROM 1 DAY AFTER LC ISSUANCE TILL 35 DAYS AFTER B/L. THE APPLICABLE QUANTITY AND PRICING DATE SHALL BE NOMINATED BY BUYER BEFORE 1200HRS SINGAPORE TIME ON THE PRICING DAY. THE NOMINATED QUANTITY MUST BE AT LEAST 20KB AND BUYER CAN NOMINATE MORE THAN ONE TIME PER DAY. ALL UN-NOMINATED QUANTITY SHALL BE PRICED OFF ON THE LAST PRICING DAY. THE FINAL PRICE SHALL BE CALCULATED TO THREE DECIMAL PLACES Field 47A: IN THE EVENT THAT THE FINAL UNIT PRICE IS NOT KNOWN AT THE TIME OF INVOICING, THE BENEFICIARY SHALL ISSUE AND THE APPLICANT SHALL MAKE PAYMENT AGAINST A PROVISIONAL INVOICE. THE PROVISIONAL INVOICE SHALL, UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES, BE CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ABOVE PRICE CLAUSE, BASIS ALL AVAILABLE QUOTATIONS KNOWN AT THE TIME OF INVOICING. ONCE THE FINAL UNIT PRICE IS KNOWN, THE SETTLEMENT FOR THE DIFFERENTIAL AMOUNT BETWEEN THE FINAL INVOICE AND THE PROVISIONAL INVOICE WILL BE MADE AS FOLLOWS: + IN THE EVENT THAT THE PROVISIONAL INVOICE AMOUNT IS LESS THAN THE FINAL INVOICE AMOUNT, THE BENEFICIARY WILL ISSUE AND PRESENT THE FINAL INVOICE BASED ON THE PRICE CLAUSE UNDER THE DOCUMENTARY CREDIT ALONG WITH ALL PHOTOCOPIES OF THE RELEVANT PROVISIONAL INVOICE PRESENTED WITHIN THE LC VALIDITY AND THAT DIFFERENTIAL AMOUNT WILL BE SETTLED WITHIN THIS LETTER OF CREDIT ON MATURITY DATE OR AT SIGHT, WHICHEVER IS LATER. The presented invoice only showed the price without indicating the details as per Field 45A, especially not including the phrase: “Invoicing based on the price clause under the documentary credit” - as underlined above. Is it acceptable?