News

ICC republishes guidelines on sanction clauses

02/03/2022

Following the escalation of sanctions on Russian businesses, individuals and financial institutions over the past few days, we have taken the decision to reissue the previous ICC guidance on the use of sanctions clauses in documentary credits in consolidated form.

To reiterate our core guidance:

Sanctions law and regulations are generally mandatory, and thus may override the ICC rules applicable to that instrument. As such, the addition of a clause, stating the bank’s commitment to respect such sanctions law or regulation applicable to it by law may be unnecessary and lead to confusion.

Nevertheless, in circumstances where a bank determines it wants to include a sanctions clause in a documentary instrument, it is recommended that the clause should be drafted in clear terms, restrictively, to limit the reference only to mandatory law applicable to the bank, and not be extended beyond that. Banks may refer to the addendum in the consolidated guidance for the drafting guidance which is combined with the guidance paper and available in the above page.

It is further reiterated that banks should refrain from issuing trade finance-related instruments that include sanctions clauses that purport to impose restrictions beyond, or conflict with, the applicable statutory or regulatory requirements. It is also advisable for practitioners to be aware of the risks posed by such clauses if included by other banks involved in their transactions, and be prepared to reject such clauses where it brings to question, the irrevocable, independent nature of the credit, demand guarantee or counter-guarantee, the certainty of payment or the intent to hour obligations. 

Further guidance/capacity building 

We are committed to supporting the market in navigating the challenges posed to legitimate trade by the recent sanctions escalation, and will consider further interventions, as appropriate, to ensure that any and all new instruments are implemented in the most efficient manner possible.

To further support the market, we will be making the ICC Academy’s introductory course on compliance available free of charge to members throughout March. Further details on how to access this complementary e-training module will be circulated later this week.


Back to recent news

Recent News

26/11/2024

The latest newsletter is now available in the members trade information section under the category of 'Newsletters'...more

ICC release Technical Advisory Briefing No. 11 - Definition of Trade Finance 19/09/2024

Recognising that there is no global standard for the defining Trade Finance, this Briefing document provides a suggested text and has been recommended for use by the ICC Banking Commisison Steering Committee...more

Latest Question

We, as the issuing bank, requested the below document, under field 46A. “Insurance policy/certificate for 10.00 percent above CIF value payable to the order of Sampath bank PLC, covering institute cargo clauses (a), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage.” Insurance certificate is presented containing below wording on the face side of the document. “The settlement of loss and damage will be effected, unless otherwise provided, through the intermediary of Marsh SA/NV to whom all documents are to be forwarded for this purpose, and will collect the indemnity under deduction of a commission of one percent” Also, it indicates the LC conditions as a mirror image as follows under the heading of "letter of credit conditions" whereas insurance conditions are incorporated separately in the certificate: "covering institute cargo clauses (A), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage" Having considered the above clauses, we have quoted below discrepancies. 1) Insurance policy indicates a deductible of 1 pct instead of irrespective of percentage. 2) Insurance not marked premium paid Beneficiary’s bank disagrees with our discrepancy and raised below argument: “Insurance policy/certificate does not indicate a deductible of 1 pct irrespective of percentage on the face of the document and banks will not examine terms and condition in insurance document as per ISBP paragraph K22 and marked as premium paid under the LC conditions. Considering above, may we have your opinion on the discrepancy quoted by us and the counter argument raised by the beneficiary’s bank.