News

Possible sanctions lifting to increase opportunities for trade finance with Iran.

10/09/2015

In a report in Gulf News: it is stated that increased trade and investment could boost growth in Iran's banking sector and support asset quality of domestic banks, although such improvements would depend on the strengthening of banks' capital levels and the implementation of structural reforms, credit rating agency Moody's said on 9 September.

"We see significant upside potential for Iranian banks from increased economic activity if sanctions are lifted. This could include new regional business opportunities relating to trade finance, letters of credit and new investments and infrastructure projects," said Constantinos Kypreos, a senior credit officer at Moody's.

Moody's said that if and when sanctions are lifted, more than half of the official reserves which are currently frozen - estimated by the Institute of International Finance (IIF (at $92 billion - may be used, for example, to recapitalise government-owned banks or be invested in building the country's infrastructure.

"Recapitalisation is much needed to unlock the growth potential of the Iranian banking sector," said Kypreos. "The repatriation of frozen assets, and potential interest from foreign investors and financial institutions, would also allow domestic banks to strengthen their solvency levels," he said.

Banks domiciled in countries with close ties and trade links to Iran, such as the UAE and Lebanon, but potentially also Western, Chinese and Indian banks, would likely be attracted to Iran's diversified economy and significant trade flows, Moody's said.

"We anticipate increased longer-term business opportunities for Dubai banks if the Iranian economy opens up, particularly given the private sector nature of the Dubai economy and its strengths as a logistics hub," said Khalid Howladar, senior credit officer at Moody's.

"In addition, a rise in inward investments from Iranian nationals could moderate the impact of the softening real estate market in Dubai," he said.

Although the banking sector in Iran offer opportunities, physical expansion into Iran would pose greater risks, according to Moody's analysts. The rating agency said that the operating and geopolitical environment is risky and would expose foreign banks to the asset quality issues inherent to emerging economies undergoing fast transformation, and would require prudent risk control and oversight.

Moody's also notes that the entire Iranian banking system is Sharia-compliant and is currently the largest among countries practicing Islamic finance. "Given the sheer size of the banking system and the country's financing needs, we expect a major boost to sukuk volumes," said Howladar. "However, Sharia harmonisation across jurisdictions would likely remain difficult," he said.


Back to recent news

Recent News

26/11/2024

The latest newsletter is now available in the members trade information section under the category of 'Newsletters'...more

ICC release Technical Advisory Briefing No. 11 - Definition of Trade Finance 19/09/2024

Recognising that there is no global standard for the defining Trade Finance, this Briefing document provides a suggested text and has been recommended for use by the ICC Banking Commisison Steering Committee...more

Latest Question

We, as the issuing bank, requested the below document, under field 46A. “Insurance policy/certificate for 10.00 percent above CIF value payable to the order of Sampath bank PLC, covering institute cargo clauses (a), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage.” Insurance certificate is presented containing below wording on the face side of the document. “The settlement of loss and damage will be effected, unless otherwise provided, through the intermediary of Marsh SA/NV to whom all documents are to be forwarded for this purpose, and will collect the indemnity under deduction of a commission of one percent” Also, it indicates the LC conditions as a mirror image as follows under the heading of "letter of credit conditions" whereas insurance conditions are incorporated separately in the certificate: "covering institute cargo clauses (A), institute war clauses (cargo), institute strike clauses (cargo), transshipment risks marked premium paid claims payable in Colombo irrespective of percentage" Having considered the above clauses, we have quoted below discrepancies. 1) Insurance policy indicates a deductible of 1 pct instead of irrespective of percentage. 2) Insurance not marked premium paid Beneficiary’s bank disagrees with our discrepancy and raised below argument: “Insurance policy/certificate does not indicate a deductible of 1 pct irrespective of percentage on the face of the document and banks will not examine terms and condition in insurance document as per ISBP paragraph K22 and marked as premium paid under the LC conditions. Considering above, may we have your opinion on the discrepancy quoted by us and the counter argument raised by the beneficiary’s bank.